In my last eurocrisis rant I argued three changes were necessary for the EU to begin crawling its way out of the hole it has dug itself into. These were viewing debt as an economic instead of a moral problem, considering the situation a political instead of an economic crisis, and ending Germany’s obsession with inflation. Sounds ambitious, but a change in German leadership would basically do the trick. By this I mean a government willing to challenge the Bundesbank (Germany’s influential central bank) and its rigid mandate to keep a low inflation rate. The ECB under Mario Draghi is moving in the right direction by issuing conditional Eurobonds, but the long-term viability of this policy requires German support.
This is not an easy sell in Germany. The ECB runs the euro on a tight monetary policy, much like the Bundesbank used to run the Deutschemark. Having a strong and stable currency worked extremely well for Germany, a powerhouse in price inelastic exports (i.e. the average Porsche owner can afford to pay ten or twelve thousand extra dollars for his Cayenne. You can imagine this does not apply to Portuguese cork or chorizo, but that’s another story.). It was also Bonn’s sine qua non when France pressed for monetary union to lock a unified Germany into European institutions.
Why would Germans give up on this? Essentially, because the alternatives are worse. The eurozone still accounts for Germany’s largest export market. If each country goes back to its relatively devalued currency, it will import even fewer BMWs than under austerity programs.
It would be unrealistic to expect such a policy shift from Angela Merkel. “Over my dead body” summarizes her current stand regarding Eurobonds. This means all hopes are placed on SPD, Germany’s historical center-left party. Just as Germany plays a leading role in Europe, SPD has exerted a great influence in the European left. It is among Europe’s oldest social democratic parties. Under Willy Brandt it played an important role moderating Spanish and Portuguese Socialism as both countries transitioned to democracy; under Gerhard Schröder it became a driving force for Third Way politics.
In this context, and in light of the 2013 general elections, much has been made of SPD’s embrace of Eurobonds. Whether the SPD is willing to depart from Germany’s current agenda is, however, an entirely different question.
To begin with, SPD must win the elections. As of today this is still unlikely. Another great coalition seems possible, given the sorry state of Merkel’s current coalition partners. Whether SPD can make such a huge difference as CDU’s junior partner is questionable.
Also questionable is whether SPD’s commitment to Eurobonds is as daring as it sounds. The designation of Peer Steinbrück as the party’s candidate for 2013 suggests the opposite. Steinbrück has argued for Eurobonds, but wants them to go hand in hand with “far reaching reforms”. What this means is more austerity. Spain has already made deficit spending unconstitutional, so it is hard to imagine how much further it can go down this road without regressing to the 19th Century.
More interesting is Financial Times’ description of Steinbrück, who served as Finance Minister during the 2005-2009 great coalition, as Merkel’s bad cop:
In a more recent, deeply sarcastic interview, he accused other European leaders of acting like “lemmings” – a species of rodents with an undeserved reputation for committing mass suicide – by following the UK in raising their deficits to battle the crisis.
That the German finance minister does not take outside advice graciously is a gross understatement. Indeed, European counterparts have long grown wary of his lengthy lectures at European meetings about the alleged superiority of German economic management and its three-pillar banking system.
…And here I was thinking all that social democrats do today is implement “austerity with a human face.” It turns out they can be also patronize and suggest Keynesians are retarded. Give them a few more years and they might even become Republicans.
My guess is in spite of Steinbrück’s rhetoric an SPD-led Germany would be more accommodating than Merkel when it comes to Eurobonds. Then again, I am a well-informed optimist and don’t expect them to deliver the drastic change Europe urgently needs. The problem is by no means restricted to SPD. It is mostly about European institutions and the failure of the European left to provide any credible alternatives to austerity. More on this next week.
Not only is there scant evidence that government spending would spur economic growth if it happened anyway, there are numerous studies and historical examples that the kind of 'stimulatory' government programs that Keynesians like you would advocate to get us out of this cyclical depression would be wasteful drainage of resources and actually supplant rather than spur much needed private investment.
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6420.html
Furthermore, in terms of actual European austerity, the Spanish, Italian, French and UK budgets have not been 'savagely cut' as the raging mobs on the streets seem to suggest. http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/…
Though I sympathize (and totally disagree) with the tax rises that I think are one of the primary reasons Europe is experiencing such violent contraction right now, government spending decreases are absolutely necessary and can be helpful to a truly robust recovery because every public dollar comes out of a private pocket that can use it more efficiently.
Europe should lower its taxes, lower its spending, stop asking Germany to inflate away the wealth of its poor and middle class to pay for their welfare states and inefficient labor markets, engage in legitimate structural reforms and maybe this whole situation might improve in a reasonably manageable timeframe that won't end up ruining the lives of the average citizen in these countries.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/warren-har…
You are missing the point. This isn't about Keynesian programs as much as it is about speculation against sovereign debt -because the ECB does not step in as a lender of last resort.
You mention the UK, which pays much less interest on its short-term debt than Spain despite a much worse debt-to-GDP ratio. The difference of course is that the UK does not belong to the eurozone. Your chart points out to a mild decrease in social spending in Spain after austerity was adopted in 2010. It fails to acknowledge the relevance of the downturn, given that during a recession social spending is meant to increase as transfer payments kick in.
As for Germany, it's not about inflating away the wealth of its poor and middle classes, but about the state of Deutsche Bank and whether this is a debt a financial crisis:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-26/deutsche…