Pitch an Article!
Fall 2025 Issue 2 Pitch Call Open Now
Do you want to have your writing featured in Brown University’s premier nonpartisan magazine for political journalism? Pitch to the Brown Political Review magazine!
Brown Political Review invites all Brown and RISD students to pitch to our second issue of Fall 2025, Special Feature: Fiction. Pitch to our United States, World, or Special Feature: Fiction sections to write for our print magazine. Submit your pitches here.
Our Magazine Managing Editor will be hosting a pitch workshop at the Center for Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (25 George St) on Thursday, October 23 from 5:30-7:30pm. Come by to learn more about the magazine process and get help on how to pitch ✍️
We will be accepting pitches until Sunday, October 26, 2025 at 11:59pm ET. If your pitch is selected, you will hear back on or around Wednesday, October 29.
Introducing Our Special Feature: Fiction
Politics runs on stories. Campaign promises, national myths, conspiracy theories, public narratives—they all blur the line between truth and fiction. Every ideology has its plot, every leader their script, every citizen a hand in writing national narratives. In a world where perception shapes policy, fiction isn’t an escape from politics—it’s one of its sharpest tools. The stories we tell ourselves inform the roles we choose to occupy in the world.
For our next issue, we invite you to join us in exploring “Fiction.” What happens when political storytelling overtakes reality? How do governments, media, and movements use fiction to build belief—or to hide the truth? And where do creative works, from canonical literary classics to silly digital memes, influence our collective consciousness and understanding of the world around us?
You might trace how propaganda reshapes history into a story that flatters power. You might look into how accusations of “fake news” have become both a weapon and a warning. Maybe you’ll explore the role of speculative fiction in political thought—how dystopias, utopias, and imagined futures expose what we fear most about the present. Or you could dig into the lies we tell ourselves as nations, as movements, as individuals just trying to make sense of chaos.
This issue is about questioning what’s real, what’s made up, and what happens when the two collide. When fiction becomes reality, who gets to be the author?
How to Pitch
A “pitch” is a 100-300 word idea for an article you would like to write. In the pitch, explain what you plan to write about, including some topics or information that you would like to cover in your piece. We nearly always select pitches that are centered around a strong argument. Each issue, we feature articles about the United States, the World, and a “special feature.”
Guidelines for a great pitch:
- Original angle
- Specific and interesting story – BPR likes all things “niche”
- Strong thesis which presents a normative claim
- Not widely covered in major news media
- Supported with empirical evidence that demonstrates your command of the topic
- Leverages your unique perspective as a college student writing about domestic or world affairs
Pitch Example 1:
Pitch: While there are more than 7,000 languages spoken worldwide, the top 20 account for over 50% of speakers and many researchers estimate that 90% of the total will be extinct by the year 2050 Even relatively prominent minority languages such as Irish are considered endangered by UNESCO, and concern has mounted about how to preserve these markers of the world’s cultural diversity. In some cases, language endangerment can be attributed to repressive government policies, but it is most often also the result of natural processes of cultural assimilation that, while still resulting in the loss of diversity, are not nearly as malicious in nature. In recent years, many governments have instituted policies to try and support regional and indigenous languages in the face of this homogenization; the United Nations has affirmed that the protection of minority languages is a matter of human rights.
Yet, government language policies are often controversial. While it seems reasonable to commit resources to compensate for government-sponsored repression of minority languages, it’s less clear when languages have become endangered by natural processes, given that some common policies can be enormously expensive. Ireland, for example, made the controversial decision to stop producing government documents in Irish during the financial crisis, which cost an enormous sum of money even though only 10% of the population speaks it outside of education. Similarly, the European Union is committed to translations of every official language of a member state, which means that the body must find and pay translators of languages like Maltese, which has just 520,000 native speakers. While few would argue that there’s no value in protecting languages as a matter of cultural value, the varying approaches taken by different governments demonstrate that there are many potentially expensive pitfalls.
Thesis: Government preservation of minority languages is a worthy goal, but this often expensive endeavor should be carefully tailored for maximum effectiveness and without being too restrictive.
Pitch Example 2:
Pitch: Surf and Turf Wars: How the lobstering economy and its lack of regulation fostered the gangland politics of Maine’s lobster ports From the inception of lobstering as a trap fishery in 1850, the Maine midcoast lobstering industry was a relatively unregulated one — lobstermen were limited in number of traps and individual lobster size, just like any other hunter would be — but in addition to the explicit regulations came traditional agreements demarcating “territories” for each lobsterman to exclusively harvest. These territories were not officially legislated like property; however, on smaller islands, each lobsterman knows all the others, lobstering is the primary livelihood, and violating such territorial agreements is equitable to trespassing on another’s land and stealing his personal income. Thus, these boundaries were sacredly respected.
However, as markets globalized it became easier to ship the Gulf of Maine’s unique lobster around the globe. Therefore, lobstering continued to become more and more lucrative bringing more lobstermen from the mainland and out of state into the market. The Lobstering communities, forced to accommodate this expansion, became tenser as territories were confined and lobstermen began to dispute what waters belonged to them. Feeling pressure to protect their incomes, lobstermen escalated tensions engaging in vandalism, threats, intimidation, fights, trap cutting with rivals as a means of gaining territory through a literal ‘trap war.’ These reached a head in 2009 when a man on Matinicus Island was shot in the neck in a territorial dispute. While there have been no further shootings, lobstermen routinely keep handguns aboard their boats, and aggravated assaults and boat sinkings continue to occur with frequency each year as the lobster high season begins.
Thesis: This article seeks to provide a closer look into one of the most unexpectedly complicated and cutthroat industries in the United States. It then asserts that these territories need to be officially recognized and regulated on both the local and state levels to curb the wave of violence that accompanies Maine’s largest export.
View our cross-publishing policy here »